By Julie A. Mertus
A superb booklet for teachers and somebody trying to find a great learn on how the human rights flow was once promoted or ignored through the put up -cold battle interval within the usa. via a number of interviews, Julie Mertus has compiled a desirable look at the realm of U.S. overseas coverage and its interplay with human rights within the foreign group. The objectivity of the publication was once important in gaining a huge point of view of varied impacts on human rights within the U.S. together with presidential administrations, civil society, and the army.
As a scholar of human rights, this publication helped me to realize a greater realizing of the united states' courting with human rights. As an avid reader, i discovered Bait and turn to be an attractive and simple tale to stick with. i'd suggest this ebook to somebody!
Read Online or Download Bait and Switch: Human Rights and U.S. Foreign Policy PDF
Similar comparative politics books
Over the last 3 a long time the results of globalization and denationalization have created a department among 'winners' and 'losers' in Western Europe. This examine examines the transformation of get together political structures in six nations (Austria, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Switzerland and the united kingdom) utilizing opinion surveys, in addition to newly accrued information on election campaigns.
After 300 years, the Anglo-Scottish Union is in critical trouble. this isn't due to a profound cultural divide among England and Scotland yet simply because fresh a long time have obvious the rebuilding of Scotland as a political group whereas the ideology and practices of the previous unionism have atrophied.
This can be the 1st educational research of the effect of semi-presidentialism in rising democracies open air of Europe. Semi-presidentialism is the place there's either a directly-elected fixed-term president and a primary minister who's dependable to the legislature. For the main half, semi-presidentialism is noticeable as being a dicy selection for brand new democracies since it can create probably destabilizing festival among the president and top minister.
In lots of western nations with sluggish fiscal progress and inhabitants development the expanding expense of the social safeguard procedure is a priority. The contributions during this quantity tackle this factor from quite a few angles, theoretically in addition to empirically and likewise bearing in mind institutional stipulations.
- Serbia's Antibureaucratic Revolution: Milosevic, the Fall of Communism and Nationalist Mobilization
- China: Politics and Government
- Revenge of the Forbidden City: The Suppression of the Falungong in China, 1999-2005
- A Theory of Militant Democracy: The Ethics of Combatting Political Extremism
Additional resources for Bait and Switch: Human Rights and U.S. Foreign Policy
S. S. foreign policy has only recently assumed an interest in human rights—that interest has been there all along. What is new is the frequency with which the United States has invoked human rights as rhetorical justifications for its actions. S. foreign policy has traditionally been framed in terms of national interests. S. S. 4 Regardless of whether one sees a redefinition of national interest or a greater accommodation of moral considerations, the United States does in fact rhetorically invoke human rights concerns in its foreign dealings with increasing frequency.
Diplomats invoke human rights rhetoric so frequently that, to some extent, they have built up expectations that the United States will demand compliance with human rights norms. S. 6 The framing of policy choices in human rights terms, however, must compete with alternative ways of interpreting the problem and, worse yet, the general public accepts these alternatives as viable choices. To put it bluntly, human rights are not the only game in town, and quite frequently other games garner more attention.
S. 69 In the realm of treaty law, Bush’s record was mixed. He signed and sent to the Senate the UN Convention against Torture and obtained consent to ratify that treaty as well as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which had been signed by Carter. S. S. 73 The UN Human Rights Commission found that the United States’ reservations to the ICCPR go too far, making them incompatible with the object and purpose of the covenant and therefore in violation of international law.